Security belongs in the software delivery pipeline. The harder question is where, how often and at what cost. Many pipeline teams eventually add security scanning to CI/CD, and relatively few go back afterward to measure what it actually cost the delivery process. Security coverage went up. Something else changed too, and it is rarely measured with the same rigor. “Shift left” gets treated as a free upgrade: catch problems earlier, at lower cost, with no real downside. That is true for the cost of fixing a vulnerability. It is not automatically true for the cost of running your pipeline. A security control can be worth adding and still change your delivery economics in ways worth naming honestly, rather than assuming they net out to zero. What Changes When Security Enters the Pipeline SAST, SCA, container scanning, secret scanning, and dependency analysis all do real work, and none of them are free to run. Each one is a pipeline stage with its own execution time, and many scale wit...
A major technical outage struck GitHub on Monday morning, disrupting workflows for millions of developers worldwide for several hours as critical services, automated testing pipelines, and artificial intelligence (AI) coding tools suffered high error rates. The hosting platform — a subsidiary of Microsoft Corp. that supports roughly 180 million users — first reported performance issues around 9:40 a.m. EDT. The disruption quickly escalated as thousands of users flooded outage-tracking platforms like Downdetector to report failing repositories, broken downloads, and degraded performance. At the peak of the incident, GitHub confirmed error rates of approximately 20% across its web interface and API traffic. Core functions faced even steeper degradation: raw repository content and archive downloads suffered error rates near 50%, while enterprise authentication features like SAML, OIDC, SCIM, and Team Sync were broadly impacted. The chaos broadened by mid-morning when GitHub confirmed d...