A global survey of 700 software engineering practices published this week finds that thanks to increased reliance on artificial intelligence (AI) coding tools, well over a third (35%) are either achieving daily or more frequent product deployments, with 36% deploying software multiple times per week. However, more than half (51%) also noted AI-generated code leads to deployment problems at least half the time. Conducted by the market research firm Coleman Parkes on behalf of Harness, the survey also finds more than three quarters (78%) admit they have fragmented delivery toolchains, with 70% of respondents also conceding their pipelines are plagued by flaky tests and deployment failures. More than three-quarters (77%) said teams often need to wait on others for routine delivery work before they can ship code and only 21% said they can add functioning build and deploy pipelines to an environment in under two hours. Nearly three quarters (72%) also said they have hardly any standar...
For years, most low-code platforms have focused on one primary challenge: efficiency . The goal was to help teams build applications faster and with less effort, reducing manual coding, speeding up iterations, empowering non-developers, and enabling apps to be created in just a few clicks. That focus delivered real value, but it’s no longer enough. Today, the low-code conversation is shifting. While automation and speed still matter, they are no longer what sets platforms apart. The next phase of low-code is about fit—how well a platform supports the real-world needs of specific industries. This new frontier moves beyond simply closing productivity gaps or automating workflows. It’s about building applications that reflect the realities of regulated environments, complex data models, existing systems, and industry-specific processes. Low code is becoming more context-aware . As a result, industry alignment is emerging as a key differentiator. Platforms that understand the nuances...