Skip to main content

Posts

Informing Stakeholders Isn’t the Same as Aligning Them

The first sign of trouble was a screenshot. We’d just switched on the A/B test via our feature management platform. Within the hour, a senior stakeholder landed in the variant feature flag, opened the app on their own phone, and sent us an image of it. The message, more or less: “Why is there a new tab in my app?” It was a fair question. It was also one I thought we’d answered weeks earlier. Turns out we never really had. That’s the day I learned the difference between telling people and aligning them. The Work We Were Proud Of My team was reworking the information architecture and frontend navigation architecture of our app. This wasn’t a cosmetic refresh. We were changing the top-level structure to match our product vision and make the app the home of our loyalty programme. It was a strategic bet, and it carried real commercial weight. We did the work properly, or so I believed at the time. We ran discovery sessions. We walked through the concep...
Recent posts

Trusted Open Source Catalogs for AI and Developers

Open source supply chain security has been a scanner-and-CVE game for years — pull the package, run the scan, cross-reference known vulnerabilities, hope the metadata is current. That model always had gaps, and AI agents are widening them fast. Agents pull open source components from wherever they can find them, at machine speed, and the after-the-fact scan is not a control that keeps up. What developers and platform teams actually need is a curated catalog that vets components before they enter the environment, not after they cause a problem. Alan Shimel sits down with Leslie Pascual, Field Engineering Manager for AI and Security Solutions at ActiveState, to work through what a trusted open source catalog looks like in practice and why it becomes table stakes as soon as AI agents join the software supply chain. Pascual brings more than 20 years across engineering, architecture and leadership, with a stint hardening enterprise healthcare applications that pushed her into cybersecurit...

Debian’s AI Vote Bets on Accountability Instead of a Ban

Most organizations writing AI usage policies right now are stuck between two bad options: ban the tools and watch people use them anyway, or say nothing and hope code review catches whatever slips through. Debian just spent two weeks working through that exact problem in public, and the way the vote landed is worth paying attention to, whether you maintain a package archive or a private repo. The Debian Project ran a General Resolution from August 15 through August 28, asking developers to settle the community’s stance on AI-assisted contributions. Eight separate proposals were on the ballot, ranging from an outright ban written into Debian’s Social Contract to a hands-off position treating AI tools like any other developer choice. Debian used the Condorcet method for the vote, meaning developers ranked their preferences rather than picking a single option, and just over 130 of roughly 1,000 eligible developers cast ballots. The ban needed a three-to-one supermajority to p...

OpenAI Cuts Off Cursor’s Model Access After SpaceX Acquisition

OpenAI is ending Cursor’s direct access to its AI models after Elon Musk’s SpaceX acquired its parent company, Anysphere. This is the next move in the increasingly bitter conflict between Elon Musk and the company he helped found. Just because you’re filthy rich doesn’t mean you still can’t have petty fights. In the latest example of big-wig tech fusses, OpenAI said it notified SpaceX on Aug. 28 that it intends to wind down its Cursor contract with a Nov. 12, 2026 shutoff date. Why? OpenAI said, “We are making this choice because we cannot be confident that SpaceX will use our technology within our terms of service. “ After all, OpenAI continued, “After Musk acquired Twitter, now part of SpaceX, the company broke ⁠ the terms of our contract (alongside many others). Under oath earlier this year, Musk admitted ⁠ that xAI, now also part of SpaceX, had violated OpenAI’s terms of service (terms which are similar to xAI’s own).” So, OpenAI is invoki...

Broadcom Launches Trusted Artifact Service for Spring Framework

Broadcom today at the VMware World Explore conference a set of hardened artifacts for the open source Spring framework, including the 5,000 dependencies that are needed to run it. TrueSource Trusted Artifacts by Broadcom provides access to artifacts built in a clean room, including instances of Apache Tomcat, Kotlin, PostgreSQL, RabbitMQ, MySQL, and Valkey databases and middleware. It also extends to the Bitnami Secure Images catalog, adding hardened, verifiably built container images for hundreds of commonly used open source packages. Based on the enterprise edition of the Spring framework that Broadcom supports, TrueSource Trusted Artifacts by Broadcom includes curated artifacts written in Java, Python and Node.js. Every library and artifact is selected against a reference architecture, then built and verified by human Broadcom engineers. That aspect of the service is critical because patches generated by AI coding that have not been validated by software engineers are much more l...

GitHub Tightens Copilot’s Billing and Governance Rules Ahead of a Busy Fall

GitHub is changing how organizations pay for Copilot, how Copilot chat handles data, and how code reviews run by default. None of these changes are dramatic on their own. Taken together, they signal something bigger: GitHub is treating Copilot less as a feature bundled into a developer’s toolkit and more as enterprise software that requires the same budget controls, data governance, and admin oversight as everything else IT already manages. For platform teams and engineering leaders, that shift matters more than any single line item. The most immediate change hits the wallet. Starting September 1, 2026, new Copilot Business and Copilot Enterprise seat assignments will require upfront payment before a user gains access. Existing customers get a little more runway — the same requirement kicks in October 1, 2026. GitHub says pricing itself isn’t changing, and seat revocation still won’t trigger a refund. But the mechanics are different: organizations will be charged for...

Cybersecurity Researchers Uncover Flaw in Google AI Coding Tool

Cybersecurity researchers from Pillar Security this week revealed how a prompt injection inserted into a GitHub repository was used to gain Editor-level access to an internal Google Cloud project using a flaw in the command line interface (CLI) of an artificial intelligence (AI) coding tool that Google provides. Dan Lisichkin, a cybersecurity researcher for Pillar Security, said the flaw, since remediated, existed in Google Gemini CLI setup code that Google uses internally to automatically read and sort bug reports filed on its public GitHub page. A Pillar Security researcher was able to file a “bug report” that included hidden instructions that resulted in a prompt injection whenever an AI agent triaged issues. That prompt resulted in a legitimate credentials file being issued via the Workload Identity Federation (WIF) framework, which the researcher then copied out. Most of those credentials were low-privilege but one permitted the researcher to impersonate a far more p...